Truck Accident Attorney Texas
If you have been injured in a truck accident, you may be entitled to compensation. We can help.

A trucking wreck injury sustained via a trucking wreck tends to be more serious than injuries sustained in other crash types. This is due largely in part to the size of trucks and how they tower over smaller vehicles. Imagine crashing into an eighteen wheeler or having one fall over on a compact car. The results can mean serious bodily harm or even death. There are some sure fire ways for truck drivers and non-truck drivers alike to avoid a trucking crash injury. The best advice is be a safe driver! Safe driving is everyone’s responsibility. The easiest way to be safe is to follow the rules of the road. Drivers need to remember their training no matter what license class they have.

Driver Negligence
It happens all too often that negligence is the cause of a trucking wreck injury. The number one way trucking accidents occur is improper lane change. The second most popular is speeding. Both of these are negligent activities that had they been avoided, so would have the trucking wreck injury. All the rules of the road need to be followed but following them especially careful when driving a big rig is important. Cars traveling around these large trucks should also be careful and be aware of the choices they are making. Never ever tailgate a large truck and truckers should never tailgate cars. This is a dangerous practice. Driving too closely is more dangerous in a truck. This is because of their mammoth size. Using caution and being aware of other vehicles driving on the road is going to ensure a longer life when trucks are involved. Keep in mind the top reasons for trucking wreck injuries and be extra careful around and in trucks. Use a turning signal when changing lanes or passing. Give a lot of space. Do not tailgate. Not only is this going to keep drivers alive but it is also going to ensure they are not pulled over and ticketed by a police officer.

Another example of negligence is driving while intoxicated. It is 100% illegal to operate a moving vehicle with a blood alcohol count above .08. Not too mention that inebriated drivers are not going to make smart decisions behind the wheel. Perceptions are skewed when under the influence. The danger is already great when someone is drinking and driving in a sedan on a suburban street but it is greatly increased when a truck is involved. Trucking wreck injuries received as a result of a drunk truck driver puts that driver and the company he represents at risk for a lawsuit. It is important that anyone injured in a trucking wreck contact an attorney to discuss their circumstance. Commercial vehicles have greater laws when concerning alcohol. Many states are adopting a zero tolerance law when it comes to imbibing drugs or alcohol and operating a commercial vehicle. Most large trucks are commercial vehicles so victims should keep that in mind. Medications can also pose a risk. Of course medications are prescribed by doctors and often need to be taken. It is important that drivers read the label and follow all instructions in regards to driving.

Distracted Driving
It should also go without saying that cell phone use is dangerous when trucking. There are numerous options for hands free devices making cell phone use reckless as well as unnecessary. Cell phones, even above alcohol use, are the leading cause of avoidable accidents. Don’t be a statistic. Keep both hands on the wheel in order to avoid a trucking wreck injury. Not doing so takes away full control over the vehicle. It also limits reaction time. One handed driving causes excessive steering which is another popular cause of trucking wreck injury. The best way to avoid excessive steering is by having both hands planted firmly on the steering wheel. Proper steering can also help avoid roll overs.

Trucking accident attorney 101 is all about learning about truckinging accidents and how having an attorney can benefit you. If you’ve been injured in a truckinging accident, it is important that you read on to discover how having the right attorney can help you get the compensation you are owed. Truckinging accidents tend to result in more serious injuries than other accident types. A good attorney can help you win your case and make sure that you’re compensated fairly.

The first part of trucking accident attorney 101 is all about the different types of truckinging accidents. There are many different ways a trucking accident can occur. The most common reason for a truckinging accident is improper lane change. Improper lane change can be difficult to prove all on your own. This is because it can come down to your word vs. the drivers. A good trucking accident attorney will be able to help you prove this case type. They will use eye witness accounts, expert opinions and accident reconstruction to prove how the driver improperly changed lanes.

Truck accident attorney 101 would like you to know trucking accidents are caused by more than just improper lane change. It is possible you’ve been injured by a negligent trucking driver who fell asleep at the wheel or made another untimely mistake that caused you injury or a family member’s death. Truckings come with sophisticated equipment that can monitor a truckinger’s behavior. These instruments may be tampered with, which is why it is important to contact an attorney as soon as you can. They will swoop in and gather this information quickly and then use it to prove negligence. No matter what a trucking driver did to cause the accident, your attorney is going to show the court and the insurance company(s), how the driver was at fault in order to win your case.

By By JOSH LEDERMAN and EMILY SWANSON

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans are souring on President Barack Obama’s approach to fighting the Islamic State, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll that also found deep pessimism about U.S. prospects for success in Afghanistan and uncertainty about Obama’s plan to leave thousands of troops there when he leaves office.

More than 6 in 10 now reject Obama’s handling of the threat posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, where Obama has been escalating the U.S. military’s involvement in a bid to break a vexing stalemate. Support for his approach has followed a downward trajectory since the U.S. formed its coalition to fight the group in late 2014. Last September, Americans were roughly split, yet disapproval has jumped 8 percentage points just since January.

Those concerns mirror broader trepidation about Obama’s management of foreign policy, which garnered approval from just 40 percent of Americans in the AP-GfK poll. They come as Obama struggles to demonstrate progress advancing U.S. interests in the Middle East, where Obama hoped to disentangle the U.S. military after a decade-plus of war but will likely leave three military conflicts ongoing when his presidency ends in 2017.

Complicating Obama’s efforts to strike the right balance, his critics include both those who feel he’s betrayed his pledge to keep U.S. troops out of combat in Iraq and Syria and those who argue exactly the opposite: that Obama is pursuing half-measures that put U.S. troops at risk but are too paltry to make a decisive difference.

“ISIS is literally laughing at our president,” said Donald Hammond, a retired police officer and Republican from Brooklyn, Ohio. He accused Obama of tying the military’s hands out of concern about potential U.S. casualties. “If we’re going to be committed to the fight, he needs to commit seriously and stop playing patty-cake.”

Patty Watson, a Democrat from Portland, Oregon, saw it differently. “I feel concerned that we’re getting pulled into that quagmire that just seems to never end,” said Watson, 54. She said she felt Obama was doing his best to confront a dangerous group but worries he’s pursuing a strategy in which the U.S. is “the sole force of that resolution.”

The AP-GfK poll was conducted before Obama’s announcement last week that up to 50 U.S. special operations troops will head to northern Syria, the first time the U.S. has openly sent forces into that civil war-wracked country. But it reflected apprehension that has grown measurably over the course of 2015, during which Obama increased the number of troops in Iraq and revamped his approach against IS, including dropping a campaign to train Syrian rebels that had failed miserably.

The Islamic State threat and the proper U.S. response promise to play a major role in the 2016 presidential campaign, in which many of the Republican candidates have called for sending ground troops into Iraq and Syria, and even Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton has called for a U.S.-imposed no-fly zone in Syria. Two-thirds of Americans say the Islamic State threat is a very or extremely important issue, the AP-GfK poll found.

Obama’s approach has drawn flak from both parties in Congress, where lawmakers have argued current U.S. policy in Syria is too limited. Grilled by members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, top U.S. diplomats defended Obama’s policy and pointed to Russia, which has unloaded a barrage of airstrikes in Syria in what the White House deems a misguided attempt to prop up Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government.

“The regime continues to barrel bomb its own citizens with impunity, perhaps even emboldened by Moscow’s help,” Victoria Nuland, the top U.S. diplomat for Europe, told Congress on Wednesday.

Concerns about Obama’s strategy overseas resonate deeply when it comes to Afghanistan, where Obama abruptly dropped his plans last month to pull nearly all U.S. forces by end of 2016. Instead, Obama will keep at least 5,500 troops there when he leaves office, hoping to protect fragile gains made over the last 14 years and shore up the fledgling Afghan security forces.

Roughly a third of Americans said they approve of that revamped plan, with one-third opposed and another third neither in favor nor against. Just 1 in 5 say it’s likely or very likely that Afghanistan can maintain a stable, democratic government once the U.S. leaves, and 71 percent predicted history will judge the Afghanistan war as more of a failure than a success.

Jamie Atkins, a 40-year-old Democrat from Easley, South Carolina, said he has mixed feelings about Obama’s overall approach to foreign affairs. But on Afghanistan, his misgivings were clear.

“I disapprove with him sending the troops to Afghanistan,” said Atkins, a disabled former construction worker. “They put their lives in danger, and some are killed in the line of duty.”

The AP-GfK Poll of 1,027 adults was conducted online Oct. 15-19, using a sample drawn from GfK’s probability-based KnowledgePanel, designed to represent the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents was plus or minus 3.3 percentage points.

___

Associated Press writer Stacy A. Anderson contributed to this report.

___